A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Periods report about René Collier as well as Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design works at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, search for to build their household household. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, the place development pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result spots are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable initiatives via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact grow to be emblematic from the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof from the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Occasions reported, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail because of the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read even more submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement in excess of boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as manufactured, goes past what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to produce a family members household in accordance With all the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out based upon professional guidance and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering the sea in the course of a storm, will not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline along with the symbolic character of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result remains unsure. The court need to establish if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living together with each other Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times lengthy once the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and house legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.